Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, together with case law at both the federal and state levels.

The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all assure legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is proven along with the employee is found guilty after because of process of law, it's the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the different penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is not suitable however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful manner. Read more

Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year old boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed in an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.

eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents from the boy or Woman do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they are able to cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either get more info himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report on the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) each plus the same shall be stored during the police station towards the effect that no harm shall be caused on the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government guidelines for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, as well as respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[4]

Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

States also generally have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, like family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common law, may be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending within the relationship between the deciding court as well as precedent, case legislation may very well be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is just not strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one district court in New York will not be binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more